I did read it. I think you're trying to mansplain to me why your taste is logical and mine is not.
See above.
See above. Also, I think the explanation and mechanic for primal knowledge is dumb and will be implementing it differently.
See above. No, you're not trying to tell people what to like. You're trying to tell them that what you like makes more sense. Because of course it does. To you. I'm not going to refute each of your points, because they aren't relevant to the real issue, and it would just be me trying to explain why your preferences are wrong and mine are right. The real issue is one of aesthetic.
My aesthetic tastes are clearly different from yours. I will buy into a certain amount of exaggeration with mundane characters, but at a certain point they lose me. Fast and Furious-style action is not for me. Aragorn, Conan, Brienne of Tarth, and Logen Ninefingers can't suddenly jump 100 foot chasms. I want there to continue to be room in D&D for characters who are awesome without needing obviously, in your face supernatural abilities.
I don't see much room for further debate between us on this particular issue, because it's like debating pizza vs. burgers.