Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Matt Colville on adventure length
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9323067" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>No, he isn't. Not even slightly.</p><p></p><p>You're making a huge and bizarre assumption that the group in general will be excited about having essentially wasted several hours creating PCs who are all now dead, and doing an adventure that they definitely aren't going to finish. Doesn't make sense.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's not just a "hot take", that's judgmental in quite a knee-jerk way, <em>flatly insulting </em>to a lot of people here reading it, and shows an apparent serious lack of broad experience of different players/groups/games on your part.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You're showing what looks very much like a lack of real/broad experience here, presumably because you're quickly pushing people out of your group if they don't respond super-positively having their PCs killed. You pretty much directly say that with "had". You're selecting hard for players who love to die, which is preventing you from seeing players who don't, but are also good players - instead you're only left with people who hate dying, but who think "bad RPG sessions are better than no RPG sessions", which is not great, and who generally aren't a lot of fun to play with.</p><p></p><p>You're also conflating setbacks, and your losing your PC and all the emotional investment, actual effort involved in creating them and so on, and that's flatly nonsensical. It's just not the same thing. In reality, many players who love their PCs, love setbacks. To the point where entire games basically use this as a major mechanic - Chronicles of Darkness (i.e. the nWoD) is essentially designed around this - the chances of losing your character without something wild happening are close to nil (not like Russian Roulette like some OSRs or early D&D). The chances of setbacks? Basically 100%, and some of them are going to be absolute whoppers.</p><p></p><p>If players operated like you say, neither the oWoD, nor the nWoD would have been at all successful, nor would many other RPGs. But they were successful, which frankly, immediately disproves your theory.</p><p></p><p>Even on a more straightforward level, a lot of players who care about their characters will to huge lengths to keep going - they won't get upset by "setbacks" - on the contrary, those motivate them to find ways around them so they can keep playing their character and keep their character alive.</p><p></p><p>There are players who give up at setbacks or get excessively upset by them - they're usually just people aren't having any fun generally - usually due to a DM/player, game/player or player/group mismatch*. If you see players giving up, and you immediately paint "BAD PEOPLE" or "BAD PLAYERS" on them, as you're claiming you do, without thinking more carefully about the causes, well, that's your choice, but it doesn't mean you're right. My experience is that if people are giving up at just setbacks, you probably need to change something up.</p><p></p><p>That can mean that the player is just not going to be a good fit, sure. It does not mean they are a bad person (all the worst people I've ever played with weren't giver-uppers, they were game-wreckers). But it can also mean that maybe that adventure is really boring. Maybe this game system isn't really working out. Maybe this person is generally unhappy with their character.</p><p></p><p>I mean the latter is surprisingly common in my experience - I had one of my players is the main group who was really having problems with setbacks the party was facing, and just seemed frustrated, and we talked - and figured out he should play a different character for a while, and then he had a great time (and even eventually went back to the first character!).</p><p></p><p>* = There is another group which is "literally children" (including teenagers) who it's very much down to a personality/emotional development/home life/hormones and so on. Kids who couldn't handle a PC dying on a Tuesday might well be able to on Tuesday next week because they're in a different mood etc. but I'm largely excluding them because that's whole other discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9323067, member: 18"] No, he isn't. Not even slightly. You're making a huge and bizarre assumption that the group in general will be excited about having essentially wasted several hours creating PCs who are all now dead, and doing an adventure that they definitely aren't going to finish. Doesn't make sense. That's not just a "hot take", that's judgmental in quite a knee-jerk way, [I]flatly insulting [/I]to a lot of people here reading it, and shows an apparent serious lack of broad experience of different players/groups/games on your part. You're showing what looks very much like a lack of real/broad experience here, presumably because you're quickly pushing people out of your group if they don't respond super-positively having their PCs killed. You pretty much directly say that with "had". You're selecting hard for players who love to die, which is preventing you from seeing players who don't, but are also good players - instead you're only left with people who hate dying, but who think "bad RPG sessions are better than no RPG sessions", which is not great, and who generally aren't a lot of fun to play with. You're also conflating setbacks, and your losing your PC and all the emotional investment, actual effort involved in creating them and so on, and that's flatly nonsensical. It's just not the same thing. In reality, many players who love their PCs, love setbacks. To the point where entire games basically use this as a major mechanic - Chronicles of Darkness (i.e. the nWoD) is essentially designed around this - the chances of losing your character without something wild happening are close to nil (not like Russian Roulette like some OSRs or early D&D). The chances of setbacks? Basically 100%, and some of them are going to be absolute whoppers. If players operated like you say, neither the oWoD, nor the nWoD would have been at all successful, nor would many other RPGs. But they were successful, which frankly, immediately disproves your theory. Even on a more straightforward level, a lot of players who care about their characters will to huge lengths to keep going - they won't get upset by "setbacks" - on the contrary, those motivate them to find ways around them so they can keep playing their character and keep their character alive. There are players who give up at setbacks or get excessively upset by them - they're usually just people aren't having any fun generally - usually due to a DM/player, game/player or player/group mismatch*. If you see players giving up, and you immediately paint "BAD PEOPLE" or "BAD PLAYERS" on them, as you're claiming you do, without thinking more carefully about the causes, well, that's your choice, but it doesn't mean you're right. My experience is that if people are giving up at just setbacks, you probably need to change something up. That can mean that the player is just not going to be a good fit, sure. It does not mean they are a bad person (all the worst people I've ever played with weren't giver-uppers, they were game-wreckers). But it can also mean that maybe that adventure is really boring. Maybe this game system isn't really working out. Maybe this person is generally unhappy with their character. I mean the latter is surprisingly common in my experience - I had one of my players is the main group who was really having problems with setbacks the party was facing, and just seemed frustrated, and we talked - and figured out he should play a different character for a while, and then he had a great time (and even eventually went back to the first character!). * = There is another group which is "literally children" (including teenagers) who it's very much down to a personality/emotional development/home life/hormones and so on. Kids who couldn't handle a PC dying on a Tuesday might well be able to on Tuesday next week because they're in a different mood etc. but I'm largely excluding them because that's whole other discussion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Matt Colville on adventure length
Top