Search results

According to B.S link removed it has. Taking out all of his insults, does he have a point irregardless? He doesn't show how keeping certain words make it 'better' Edited to remove flame bait link to extremely anti-inclusive, bigoted spewing. Also, “irregardless” isn’t a word.

Where can I find that?

I found out that his latest lawsuit against GENCON was dismissed with prejudice: Thread by @robertbohl, Zak Smith / Gen Con lawsuit documents:https://… Read this to see how Zak screwed himself over. The people who cry they are the persecuted are the biggest grifters

Is he right about AD&D: Just Because AD&D Did Some Stuff Differently Doesn't Make It Better -… He tries to talk about it and correct someone else's misinterpretations...but honestly: It seems like he thinks everyone makes characters for novelty instead of fun.

From here: Not according to Tolkien And you don't know your Tolkien: Tolkien’s Jewish Question The one in which you have sole ownership over and own all ip? "I hate nuance!" So if it's not real it can hurt the real people? This is false. So no bad stories every use stereotypes...

I am aware of the incredibly tactless and mean spirited language there, but was there any legit criticisms there?

Here is a very negative review: Mod Edit: link removed What are your thoughts on this?

I don't think they understand what "trans-gender" means. If anythig, they are pushing non-binary species without calling them as such. EDIT: Now that I think about it, the species is gender-fluid...my point still stands on the sheer lack of irony in their ideas.

And yet David thinks Humans being the default is ok...and has precedent going back...as far back as he wants it.

If you think that bad let's see what he says about some pieces of art like this: And this: He is making alot of assumptions in thinking art has to exactly be representative of the game. How much art in the history of D&D was accurate? Also: And he shows this...was this ever the case of...

Looking at all this behavior I wonder how the people who defend NuTSR like David Gyull respond to the news considering how much they accuse the "woke" of being perverts and "the real racists".

Links please? Also what do people think it was meant when Ernie said "enforcing or even having the concepts of gender identity"? Like rereading that makes me wonder if he was accepting pro-trans voices...

Saw this on 1d4chan: Was this confirmed?

The time they called a transwoman disgusting caused them to deflect alot from why they did so: Well was it so hard to respond with what he meant about "enforcing or even having the concept of gender identity?" What made this self-serving and shameless? That is a big leap of logic there, or at...

Because frankly this doesn't seem like the best solution: Wow...so was killing him the way to get that across though. What ever happened to being defiant? Or escapist fiction? And here... So he complains people need to man up and separate reality from fiction...despite admitting that its...

Because frankly this doesn't seem like the best solution: Wow...so was killing him the way to get that across though. What ever happened to being defiant? Or escapist fiction? And here... So he complains people need to man up and separate reality from fiction...despite admitting that its...

To be fair, those books are far more progressive than we give them credit for: Tarzan / YMMV - TV Tropes It wouldn't be that hard to turn down the steryotypes/add nuance and keep them more or less in their Pulp Action roots, which are usually universal to begin with

"By today's standards"? It's the fact we can do better research now on different cultures and see how they are DIFFERENT, shows that the standards probably weren't that good then.

I understand. I wasn't aware of any previous discussions on the topic. I am asking in good faith.

From here: Well here is the thing, did Kwan have a point? Sure people might say "let us have fun" but I suspect that to Asian and Muslim characters, seeing their culture reduced to a theme-park version would be turned off for understandable reasons. Off course: Well here's the thing...